Why modification of the LD50 test will not be enough

By Balls, M.

During the last 10 years, the 'Three Rs' (reduction, refinement and replacement) concept of alternatives has come to be widely accepted, and new national and international laws require that non-animal procedures should replace animal experimentation wherever possible. Some reduction and refinement of animal use in toxicity testing has been achieved, and nonanimal methods are becoming widely used as prescreens. However, even replacing the LD50 test by a modified and validated animal test, the Fixed Dose Procedure, will be a major achievement. In this paper it is argued that this is not good enough, and that more effort must be put into the development, validation, acceptance and use of genuine replacement alternative tests.



Issued: July 1991

Journal Title: Laboratory animals

ISSN: 0023-6772

Volume issue: 25 v. 3 no.

Pages: 198 - 206

AGRICOLA identifier: IND92059522

DOI identifier: 10.1258/002367791780808310
This page was updated on 20 May 2022
Did you find what you were looking for?
Yes, I found it! No, I did not!

Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.

What are you looking for?

We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!

Please contact us by email if you have any questions.

Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.

RadioButtonList field
 

Abonnér på nyhetsbrevene fra Norecopa