The Use of Reconstructed Human Epidermis for Skin Absorption Testing: Results of the Validation Study
By Schäfer-Korting, Monika - Bock, Udo - Diembeck, Walter - Düsing, Hans-Jürgen - Gamer, Armin - Haltner-Ukomadu, Eleonore - Hoffmann, Christine - Kaca, Monika - Kamp, Hennicke - Kersen, Silke - Kietzmann, Manfred - Korting, Hans Christian - Krächter, Hans-Udo - Lehr, Claus-Michael - Liebsch, Manfred - Mehling, Annette
| Record number: | 2110139 |
|---|---|
| Category: | skin - hides and skins - epidermis (animal) - nonanimal tests - models - absorption |
A formal validation study was performed, in order to investigate whether the commerciallyavailable reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) models, EPISKIN, EpiDerm and SkinEthic, are suitable for in vitro skin absorption testing. The skin types currently recommended in the OECD Test Guideline 428, namely, ex vivo human epidermis and pig skin, were used as references. Based on the promising outcome of the prevalidation study, the panel of test substances was enlarged to nine substances, covering a wider spectrum of physicochemical properties. The substances were tested under both infinite-dose and finitedose conditions, in ten laboratories, under strictly controlled conditions. The data were subjected to independent statistical analyses. Intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory variability contributed almost equally to the total variability, which was in the same range as that in preceding studies. In general, permeation of the RHE models exceeded that of human epidermis and pig skin (the SkinEthic RHE was found to be the most permeable), yet the ranking of substance permeation through the three tested RHE models and the pig skin reflected the permeation through human epidermis. In addition, both infinite-dose and finite-dose experiments are feasible with RHE models. The RHE models did not show the expected significantly better reproducibility, as compared to excised skin, despite a tendency toward lower variability of the data. Importantly, however, the permeation data showed a sufficient correlation between all the preparations examined. Thus, the RHE models, EPISKIN, EpiDerm and SkinEthic, are appropriate alternatives to human and pig skin, for the in vitro assessment of the permeation and penetration of substances when applied as aqueous solutions.
Issued: May 2008
Journal Title: Alternatives to laboratory animals
ISSN: 0261-1929
Volume issue: 36 v. 2 no.
Pages: 161 - 187
AGRICOLA identifier: IND44117800
Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.
What are you looking for?
We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!
Please contact us by email if you have any questions.