The use of bootstrap resampling to assess the uncertainty of Cooper statistics
By Worth, A.P. - Cronin, M.T.D.
| Record number: | 2928477 |
|---|---|
| Category: | animal use alternatives - statistical analysis - skin tests - irritant properties - prediction - accuracy - pH - chemical substances - animal use replacement |
The predictive abilities of two-group classification models (CMs) are often expressed in terms of their Cooper statistics. These statistics are often reported without any indication of their uncertainty, making it impossible to judge whether the predicted classifications are significantly better than the predictions made by a different CM, or whether the predictive performance of the CM exceeds predefined performance criteria in a statistically significant way. Bootstrap resampling routines are reported that provide a means of expressing the uncertainty associated with Cooper statistics. The usefulness of the bootstrapping routines is illustrated by constructing 95% confidence intervals for the Cooper statistics of four alternative skin-corrosivity tests (the rat skin transcutaneous electrical resistance assay, EPISKIN Skin and CORROSITEX), and four two-step sequences in which each in vitro test is used in combination with a physicochemical test for skin corrosion based on pH measurements.
Issued: July/Aug 2001
Journal Title: Alternatives to laboratory animals
ISSN: 0261-1929
Volume issue: 29 v. 4 no.
Pages: 447 - 459
AGRICOLA identifier: IND23254065
Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.
What are you looking for?
We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!
Please contact us by email if you have any questions.