Replacing animal experiments: choices, chances and challenges
By Langley, Gill - Evans, Tom - Holgate, Stephen T. - Jones, Anthony
| Record number: | 3102171 |
|---|---|
| Category: | animal experimentation - animal use alternatives - animals - computer techniques - dentistry - funding - in vitro studies - models - pain - sepsis (infection) - university research |
Replacing animal procedures with methods such as cells and tissues in vitro, volunteer studies, physicochemical techniques and computer modelling, is driven by legislative, scientific and moral imperatives. Non-animal approaches are now considered as advanced methods that can overcome many of the limitations of animal experiments. In testing medicines and chemicals, in vitro assays have spared hundreds of thousands of animals. In contrast, academic animal use continues to rise and the concept of replacement seems less well accepted in university research. Even so, some animal procedures have been replaced in neurological, reproductive and dentistry research and progress is being made in fields such as respiratory illnesses, pain and sepsis. Systematic reviews of the transferability of animal data to the clinical setting may encourage a fresh look for novel non-animal methods and, as mainstream funding becomes available, more advances in replacement are expected. BioEssays 29:918-926, 2007. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issued: Sept. 2007
Journal Title: BioEssays
ISSN: 0265-9247
Volume issue: 29 v. 9 no.
Pages: 918 - 926
Publisher: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
AGRICOLA identifier: IND43941392
DOI identifier: 10.1002/bies.20628
Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.
What are you looking for?
We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!
Please contact us by email if you have any questions.