Mode of action based risk assessment of the botanical food-borne alkenylbenzene apiol from parsley using physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling and read-across from safrole
By Abdalmajeed M. Alajlouni - Amer J. Al_Malahmeh - Reiko Kiwamoto - Sebastiaan Wesseling - Ans E.M.F. Soffers - Ala A.A. Al-Subeihi - Jacques Vervoort - Ivonne M.C.M. Rietjens
| Record number: | 5257841 |
|---|---|
| Category: | animal use alternatives - average daily intake - carcinogenicity - liver - mechanism of action - metabolites - models - neoplasms - parsley - prediction - rats - risk management - safrole - toxicity testing |
The present study developed physiologically-based kinetic (PBK) models for the alkenylbenzene apiol in order to facilitate risk assessment based on read-across from the related alkenylbenzene safrole. Model predictions indicate that in rat liver the formation of the 1′-sulfoxy metabolite is about 3 times lower for apiol than for safrole. These data support that the lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose resulting in a 10% extra cancer incidence (BMDL10) that would be obtained in a rodent carcinogenicity study with apiol may be 3-fold higher for apiol than for safrole. These results enable a preliminary risk assessment for apiol, for which tumor data are not available, using a BMDL10 value of 3 times the BMDL10 for safrole. Based on an estimated BMDL10 for apiol of 5.7–15.3 mg/kg body wt per day and an estimated daily intake of 4 × 10−5 mg/kg body wt per day, the margin of exposure (MOE) would amount to 140,000–385,000. This indicates a low priority for risk management. The present study shows how PBK modelling can contribute to the development of alternatives for animal testing, facilitating read-across from compounds for which in vivo toxicity studies on tumor formation are available to compounds for which these data are unavailable.
Issued: March 2016
Journal Title: Food and chemical toxicology
ISSN: 0278-6915
Volume issue: 89 v.
Pages: 138 - 150
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
AGRICOLA identifier: IND605257841
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.01.018
Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.
What are you looking for?
We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!
Please contact us by email if you have any questions.