Report on the international workshop on alternative methods for Leptospira vaccine potency testing: State of the science and the way forward

By William Stokes - Geetha Srinivas - Richard McFarland - Jodie Kulpa-Eddy - Warren Casey - Angela Walker - Hans Draayer - Randy Sebring - Karen Brown - Elisabeth Balks - Catrina Stirling - Eric Klaasen - Richard Hill - Byron Rippke - Kevin Ruby - David Alt - Suman Mukhopadhyay - Hajime Kojima - Nelson Johnson - Lori Rinckel - Vivian Doelling - Brett Jones

Routine potency testing of Leptospira vaccines is mostly conducted using a vaccination–challenge test that involves large numbers of hamsters and unrelieved pain and distress. NICEATM, ICCVAM, and their international partners organized a workshop to review the state of the science of alternative methods that might replace, reduce, and refine the use of animals for veterinary Leptospira vaccine potency testing and to identify ways to advance improved alternative methods. Vaccine manufacturers were encouraged to initiate or continue product-specific validation using in vitro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as replacements for potency testing of four common Leptospira serogroups. Participants discussed the potential for eliminating the back-titration procedure in the hamster challenge assay, which could reduce animal use by 50% for each individual potency test. Further animal reduction may also be possible by using cryopreserved Leptospira stock to replace continual passaging through hamsters. Serology assays were identified as a way to further reduce and refine animal use but should be considered only after attempting in vitro assays. Workshop participants encouraged consideration of analgesics and use of earlier humane endpoints when the hamster vaccination–challenge potency assay is used. International harmonization of alternative potency methods was recommended to avoid duplicative potency testing to meet regionally different requirements.



Issued: September 2013

Journal Title: Biologicals

ISSN: 1045-1056

Volume issue: 41 v. 5 no.

Pages: 279 - 294

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

AGRICOLA identifier: IND600902796

DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2013.06.013
This page was updated on 11 February 2021
Fant du det du lette etter?
Ja, jeg fant det! Nei, jeg fant det ikke!

Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.

Hva lette du etter?

Gi oss gjerne en tilbakemelding slik at vi kan forbedre informasjonen på siden. På forhånd takk for hjelpen! Vennligst skriv inn din epostadresse hvis du vil ha et svar.

Kontakt oss gjerne på e-post hvis du har spørsmål.

Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.

RadioButtonList field
 

Abonnér på nyhetsbrevene fra Norecopa