Validation of in vitro cytotoxicity tests--past and present strategies
By Ekwall, B. - Bondesson, I. - Hellberg, S. - Hogberg, J. - Romert, L. - Stenberg, K. - Walum, E.
| Record number: | 1665142 |
|---|---|
| Category: | animal use alternatives - cytotoxicity - validity |
In recent years, conventional toxicity testing in animals has been reinforced by in vitro methods. As a result, toxicity testing in some sectors has become more effective and at the same time more ethical. This trend is probably only at its beginning, as many of the newly-developed methods have not yet won general acceptance as a basis for the large-scale replacement and reduction of animal experimentation. What limits the wider use of these methods is validation, i.e. the evaluation of their reliability and relevance. The present paper is a short review of the validation efforts made hitherto, including projects being planned and under discussion. Our own MEIC approach is compared with other strategies. Finally, our opinion on the effectiveness of one large consensus project relative to several different smaller validation programmes is expressed--we advocate the latter strategy, because it will save time and reduce costs.
Issued: Apr 1991
Journal Title: Alternatives to laboratory animals
ISSN: 0261-1929
Volume issue: 19 v. 2 no.
Pages: 226 - 233
Notes:
Paper presented at the "Eighth Congress on In Vitro Toxicology of the Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicology," Sept. 13-16, 1990, Norway.
AGRICOLA identifier: IND20355272
Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.
What are you looking for?
We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!
Please contact us by email if you have any questions.