Validation of in vitro cytotoxicity tests--past and present strategies
By Ekwall, B. - Bondesson, I. - Hellberg, S. - Hogberg, J. - Romert, L. - Stenberg, K. - Walum, E.
| Record number: | 1665142 |
|---|---|
| Category: | animal use alternatives - cytotoxicity - validity |
In recent years, conventional toxicity testing in animals has been reinforced by in vitro methods. As a result, toxicity testing in some sectors has become more effective and at the same time more ethical. This trend is probably only at its beginning, as many of the newly-developed methods have not yet won general acceptance as a basis for the large-scale replacement and reduction of animal experimentation. What limits the wider use of these methods is validation, i.e. the evaluation of their reliability and relevance. The present paper is a short review of the validation efforts made hitherto, including projects being planned and under discussion. Our own MEIC approach is compared with other strategies. Finally, our opinion on the effectiveness of one large consensus project relative to several different smaller validation programmes is expressed--we advocate the latter strategy, because it will save time and reduce costs.
Issued: Apr 1991
Journal Title: Alternatives to laboratory animals
ISSN: 0261-1929
Volume issue: 19 v. 2 no.
Pages: 226 - 233
Notes:
Paper presented at the "Eighth Congress on In Vitro Toxicology of the Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicology," Sept. 13-16, 1990, Norway.
AGRICOLA identifier: IND20355272
Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.
Hva lette du etter?
Gi oss gjerne en tilbakemelding slik at vi kan forbedre informasjonen på siden. På forhånd takk for hjelpen! Vennligst skriv inn din epostadresse hvis du vil ha et svar.
Kontakt oss gjerne på e-post hvis du har spørsmål.