The public debate about animal experimentation

By Matfield, M.

The nature of campaigning against animal experimentation and its effects on public opinion and laboratory animal welfare are examined. A three-part model is proposed in which the activities of campaigning groups form the motivation phase which, in some circumstances, can produce the second phase: change of public attitudes. This leads to the third phase: making the change, in which the animal researchers, technicians and veterinarians change their practice. The role of organisations promoting the Three Rs is incorporated by viewing their role as catalysing the progression through the three phases. Some of the consequences of this model for the development of in vitro alternatives are examined.



Issued: May/June 1995

Journal Title: Alternatives to laboratory animals

ISSN: 0261-1929

Volume issue: 23 v. 3 no.

Pages: 312 - 316

AGRICOLA identifier: IND20542052
This page was updated on 11 February 2021
Did you find what you were looking for?
Yes, I found it! No, I did not!

Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.

What are you looking for?

We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!

Please contact us by email if you have any questions.

Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.

RadioButtonList field
 

Abonnér på nyhetsbrevene fra Norecopa