The public debate about animal experimentation

By Matfield, M.

The nature of campaigning against animal experimentation and its effects on public opinion and laboratory animal welfare are examined. A three-part model is proposed in which the activities of campaigning groups form the motivation phase which, in some circumstances, can produce the second phase: change of public attitudes. This leads to the third phase: making the change, in which the animal researchers, technicians and veterinarians change their practice. The role of organisations promoting the Three Rs is incorporated by viewing their role as catalysing the progression through the three phases. Some of the consequences of this model for the development of in vitro alternatives are examined.



Issued: May/June 1995

Journal Title: Alternatives to laboratory animals

ISSN: 0261-1929

Volume issue: 23 v. 3 no.

Pages: 312 - 316

AGRICOLA identifier: IND20542052
This page was updated on 11 February 2021
Fant du det du lette etter?
Ja, jeg fant det! Nei, jeg fant det ikke!

Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.

Hva lette du etter?

Gi oss gjerne en tilbakemelding slik at vi kan forbedre informasjonen på siden. På forhånd takk for hjelpen! Vennligst skriv inn din epostadresse hvis du vil ha et svar.

Kontakt oss gjerne på e-post hvis du har spørsmål.

Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.

RadioButtonList field
 

Abonnér på nyhetsbrevene fra Norecopa